FST 650
Instructor: W. James Harper and Ron Harris 205 Vivian Hall 292-7798
Office Hours: M 8:00 - 10:00 generally available at other times.
| Class Time: | Lecture | T 8:00 - 10:00 | |
| Recitation | Arranged | ||
| Lab | M,W 8:00-11:00 |
Prerequisites: FST 621; FST 401 or FST 630; one course in
statistics or permission of instructor [Intent of the
prerequisites: Students are expected to come to the course with a
basic knowledge of food ingredients and food processing as well
as a working knowledge of statistics.]
Course Philosophy: The commercial end result of food science
is the delivery of acceptable foods to consumers. This course
will immerse students in the product development process using
the product development team approach that is prevalent in the
food industry. Students will be required to access resources in a
variety of ways. Specific reading assignments will be rare, but
students will be required to acquire the knowledge necessary to
successfully complete their project assignment. As in the
industry,achievement of team goals will be rewarded.
Objectives: Students completing 650 should:
Lecture Outline
| Week | Topic | ||
| 1 | M Lab | Introduction and overview. Organization and assignment of team. Definition of roles | |
| T.Lect | Product Concepts; how to proceed; factors to consider; concept methodology; consumer testing | ||
| W.Lab | Product attributes - what they are and their
significance; ideation and development of 10 ideas for screening; market research and selection of 3 products for concept testing |
||
| 2 | M Lab | Preparation of concept testing documentation. Determination of product attributes for 3 products | |
| T.Lect | Concept testing approaches; sampling methods; role or sensory evaluation; introduction to statistical design | ||
| W.Lab | Project management. Conduct concept test panel and complete results | ||
| 3 | M Lab | Draft and present product development objectives as a par of a project authorization request, formulation requirements | |
| T.Lect | Statistical methods for evaluation of concepts and for experimental design | ||
| W.Lab | Develop a protocol for lab testing of prototype screening experiment. Determine process flow chart, become familiar with equipment needs. | ||
| 4 | M Lab | Teams should bring as many ingredients as possible to lab. Discuss what additives might be useful and arrange to obtain those not available. Continue to learn how to use production equipment. Progress report due. | |
| T.Lect | Prototype development; role of ingredients and processing in defining attributes; scale up | ||
| W.Lab | Make an evaluate prototype product in lab. | ||
| 5 | M Lab | Determine critical control points and how to assess them; develop nutritional label; consider packaging requirements; look at scale-up requirements; begin pilot plant operation | |
| T.Lect | Process flow sheet development; factors to consider in process development; process optimization; HACCP, PARS; More statistical design | ||
| W.Lab | Evaluation of product and determination of approach for optimization - using appropriate experimental design. | ||
| 6 | M Lab | Continue production and evaluation of product | |
| T.Lect | Factors to consider beyond formulation and processing - shelf life requirements; product performance testing; market positioning | ||
| W.Lab | Process prototype product and evaluate | ||
| 7 | M Lab | Present product prototype to small trained panel of consumers for evaluation - complete with label and package design | |
| T.Lect | Integration of R&D; specifications; manufacturing and marketing; developing test market strategies; how to run a plant trial. Progress Report due. | ||
| W.Lab | Evaluate composition and characteristics of prototype product | ||
| 8 | M Lab | Holiday - no classes | |
| T.Lect | Shelf-life requirements and factors affecting shelf-life and product attributes; methods of assessment | ||
| W.Lab | Produce final product and evaluate | ||
| 9 | M Lab | Test safety of product and characterize attributes | |
| T.Lect | Consumer; statistical requirements; evaluation of results | ||
| W.Lab | Final consumer testing and statistical evaluation of results | ||
| 10 | M Lab | Continuation of consumer testing and final report preparation | |
| T.Lect | Review | ||
| W.Lab | Oral Presentations and overall discussion of results. Final reports due. |
Recommended Text:
Fuller, G. W. New Food Product Development From Concept to
Marketplace. CRC Press, Boca Raton (On Researve in Agr. Library
Recommended Readings and Reserve Materials:
Fuller, G. W. New Food Product Development From Concept to Marketplace. CRC Presds, Boca Raton (On Reserve in Agr. Library
Baker, R. C. 1988. Fundamentals of New Food Product Development
Dickinson&Stainsby. 1988. Advances in food emulsions and foams. Elsevier Applied Sciences
Gould, W. A. 1991. Research and Development Guidelines for the Food Industry
Igoe, R. S 1983. Dictionary Of Food Ingredients. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
Larsson& Friberg. 1990 Food emulsions. Marcel Dekker
Lewis, R. J. 1989. Food Additives Handbook. Van Nostrand Reinhold
Lyon, D. H. 1992. Guidelines for Sensory Analysis in Food Product Development and Quality Control. Chapman and Hall Modified starches properties and uses. CRC Press Press, Inc. San Diego
Moskowitz, J. R. 1994. Food Concepts and Products.
Pomeranz, Y. 1985. Functional Properties Of Food Components. Academic Press
Radley. J. A. 1968. Starch and its derivatives. Chapman and Hall
Stauffer, C. E. 1990. Functional Additives for Bakery Foods. Van Nostrand Reinhold
Singh, R. P. and Heldman, D. R. 1993. Introduction to Food Engineering, 2nd ed. Academic
Whistler, R. L. 1973. Industrial Gums, Polysaccharides and Their Derivatives Academic Press
Wong, D. W. S. 1989. Mechanism & Theory In Food Chemistry. Van Nostrand Reinhold
Wurzburg, O. B. 1986. Modified starches : properties and uses. CRC Press Press, Inc. San Diego
Journal of Food Science
Food Technology
Food Product Development
Team Learning:
Because of limited resources, it is necessary for student to work in groups (not more than 3-4 per group). For the group to be successful , it is essential that each student contributes to the overall effort of the group. It is suggested that the group divide the responsibilities for each project.
Participation and Peer Review:
Participation means:
Three times during the quarter, a questionnaire will be distributed to give each student an opportunity to provide feedback on their own participation and others in the group. It is expected that the group will resolve any conflicts that may arise from failure of one of the group to participate. In those rare cases where resolution within the group is not possible, the group may undertake a divorce procedure. In such cases the Instructor will meet with the entire group to resolve the problem.
Oral Presentation:
Each member of the R&D team will participate in the oral presentation of the product development project. The total oral presentation for a team should be not more than 45 minutes with 15 minutes for discussion The presentation will be evaluated on the basis of the following:
Reports:
Three reports will be prepared during the quarter:
The final report will include the two previous reports, plus a report on the development of evaluation of the final pilot plant product. The requirements and grading criteria for each report will be distributed to the students in advance.
Grading:
Food product development in the real world is a team process where the team is rewarded for success and frequently fired for failure. In this course, we will measure success based on the achievement of the assigned end points and not commercial success of the product. The oral final will be a group event, but individual grades will be given.
| Three written progress reports | 200 points | ||
| report 1 | 70 points | ||
| report 2 | 70 points | ||
| report 3 | 60 points | ||
| Oral report | 50 points | ||
| Participation | 50 points | ||
| Peer Review | 25 points | ||
| Oral Final Exam | 75 points |
Grading Scale
| A | 400=375 | C+ | 319-307 | |
| A- | 374-360 | C | 306-293 | |
| B+ | 359-347 | C- | 292-280 | |
| B | 346-333 | D+ | 279-267 | |
| B- | 332-320 | D | 266-240 | |
| E | Below 240 |
Academic misconduct:
This course requires group participation and cooperation.
Reports will be group reports and as such will require working
together. You are expected to marshal all the resources you can
towards solving your problem and thus, consultation with others
is expected and this will not constitute academic misconduct.
Plagiarism and falsification of information will be dealt with
following the academic misconduct rules of The Ohio State
University.