 
Home Top |
|
The evaluation forms used for determining the
performance of both written reports and oral presentations are outlined below:
SHORT TERM PROBLEMS - ORAL
PRESENTATION EVALUATION
FST 696
EVALUATION OF ORAL PRESENTATIONS
FOR SHORT TERM PROBLEMS
Presentation Form
Name
_________________________ Problem # _____________
Team #________ Group Grade:_____/50
Leader Grade:_____/100
|
Rating
|
Notes and Comments
|
|
1.Overall
Organization: [10]
(Information clearly presented and easy to follow.)
|
|
|
2.
English [30] (Paper well
proofed, spelling, proper sentence structure; information logical,
concise and integrated.)
|
|
|
3. Content:
[50] (Problem well defined; most probable causes justified;
solutions logical, listed in order of priority and justified; all
solutions practicable.)
|
|
|
4.References:[10]
(Cited in body of report and properly listed at end of paper.)
|
|
Note: Writing constitutes 30% of the
total grade.
SHORT TERM PROBLEMS - WRITTEN PAPER
EVALUATION
FST 696
Evaluation of Short Term Written Reports
for Short Term Problems
Name _________________________ Problem #
_____________
Team #________ Overall Grade: _________
Rating |
Notes and Comments |
| 1.Overall
Organization: [10] (Logical, integrated, systematic). |
|
| 2. English [30] (
paper well proofed, spelling, proper sentence structure; information clearly presented,
concise and easy to follow.) |
|
| 3. Content: [50]
Problem well defined; most probable causes justified; solutions logical, listed in order
of priority and justified |
|
| 4.References:[10] (Cited
in body of report and property listed at end of paper) |
|
Note: Writing constitutes 30% of the total grade.
LONG TERM PROBLEM - ORAL PRESENTATION
EVALUATION FORM
FST 696
EVALUATION OF ORAL PRESENTATIONS
FOR LONG TERM PROBLEMS
Name _ ________________________
Problem__________________
Group_________
Rating |
Notes and Comments |
| 1. Organization: (Logical,
integrated, systematic). |
|
| 2. Clarity: (Information is
pertinent, and easily understood). |
|
| 3. Content: Clearly
provides adequate information methods, results, discussion and conclusions |
|
| 4. Presentation Skills: (Comfortable,
projects voice, good pace, confident, managerial presence; stay within time limits. |
|
| 5. Visual Aids: (Readable,
pertinent, understandable). |
|
| 6. Participation in Discussion:
Takes part in answering questions effectively |
|
LONG TERM PROBLEM - PRELIMINARY REPORT
EVALUATION
Name
_________________________
Problem _________________________
Group
___________
Overall
Grade: _________
|
Rating
|
Notes
and Comments
|
|
1.
Organization of report (10) (Information clearly
presented and easy to follow.)
|
|
|
2.
English Mechanics (25) (Paper well- proofed, spelling, proper sentence
structure, concise, clear.)
|
|
|
3.
Introduction: (5) (Problem well defined; why it is important.)
|
|
|
4.
Literature Review: (25) (Background adequately presented and supported by
literature. Shows
careful thought and use of outside resources to explain direction
chosen.)
|
|
|
5.
Methods (25) (Direction clear; procedures adequate and could be duplicated;
Experimental plan adequate; future plans clear.)
|
|
|
6.
Progress to date: (5) Effort in work and report evident; results
presented clearly, graphs adequate
|
|
|
7.
References (5) (proper use and citation of references)
|
|
LONG TERM PROBLEM - FINAL REPORT
EVALUATION
FST 696
EVALUATION OF FINAL REPORT
FOR THE LONG-TERM PROBLEM
Name _________________________
Problem __________________________
Group ___________
Overall Grade: _________
Rating |
Notes and Comments |
| 1.Overall Organization
[10] (Logical, integrated, systematic). |
|
| 2.English Mechanics
[25] ( Paper well proofed, spelling, proper sentence structure; information clearly
presented, concise and easy to follow.) |
|
| 3. Introduction [10]
Problem and background adequately presented, and supported by literature |
|
| 4. Procedures [10]
Fully described so that results could be duplicated. |
|
| 5. Results and
Discussion [30} Effort evident in work and report. Results meaningful and supported by
data. Good tables and figures. Meaning of results clearly explained and interpreted |
|
| 5.Summary and
Recommendations - or Executive Summary [5]: Well considered and thought out, based on
findings. |
|
| 6. References:[10] (Cited
in body of report and property listed at end of paper) |
|
|
